Explaining, or sustaining, the status quo? The potentially self-fulfilling effects of 'hardwired' accounts of sex differences

Cordelia Fine*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article I flesh out support for observations that scientific accounts of social groups can influence the very groups and mental phenomena under investigation. The controversial hypothesis that there are hardwired differences between the brains of males and females that contribute to sex differences in gender-typed behaviour is common in both the scientific and popular media. Here I present evidence that such claims, quite independently of their scientific validity, have scope to sustain the very sex differences they seek to explain. I argue that, while further research is required, such claims can have self-fulfilling effects via their influence on social perception, behaviour and attitudes. The real effects of the products of scientists' research on our minds and society, together with the fact that all scientific hypotheses are subject to dispute and disconfirmation, point to a need for scientists to consider the ethical implications of their work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-294
Number of pages10
JournalNeuroethics
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Essentialism
  • Gender
  • Neuroethics
  • Stereotypes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining, or sustaining, the status quo? The potentially self-fulfilling effects of 'hardwired' accounts of sex differences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this