Abstract
Recent research has noted that motivational theories can be tested under conditions of needs thwarting (e.g. rejection). We used Cyberball to thwart needs associated with inclusion and exclusion. Results suggested that the four needs hypothesised by Williams (2001), may not be distinct, in line with sociometer theory. However, given the poor psychometric properties of the measures used, replication with behavioural measures is necessary. Furthermore, debriefing of participants in a further study raised doubts regarding Cyberball’s effectiveness as a rejection manipulation. A critical review of the Cyberball literature suggests that although proponents claim Cyberball shows an evolutionary adaptive primal reaction to rejection, the evidence is inconclusive, as the behavioural and brain imaging evidence could be due to frustration, not rejection. Users of Cyberball are encouraged to attend to share their experiences
with this paradigm.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 28 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Australian Journal of Psychology |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | Suppl. 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2006 |
Event | Annual meeting of the Society of Australasian Social Psychologists (SASP) (35th : 2006) - Canberra Duration: 20 Apr 2006 → 23 Apr 2006 |