Abstract
Admission handoffs between emergency physicians (EPs) and internal medicine/hospitalist physicians (IMHPs), a frequently occurring form of patient transfer, remain understudied despite their importance to care continuity. Handoffs function as more than simple information transfer; they require a repertoire of interpersonal skills to accomplish tasks and develop professional relationships. Relational Dialectics Theory (RDT), a perspective that asserts social life consists of oppositional and unified discourses present in personal relationships, frames the current study. We use role dialectics to more fully understand the contradictions that emerge from the competing discourses of physician roles. Data were collected from six focus groups consisting of residents and attending physicians working at a large, urban, academic medical center in the Midwest United States. Using a grounded, constant-comparative approach, analysis of transcripts reveals that these physicians encounter two key role dialectics during handoffs: autonomy–collaboration and uncertainty–certainty. Interventions for physicians and hospital decision-makers are recommended.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 399-414 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Communication Research |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- care transitions
- emergency medicine
- handoffs
- inpatient medicine
- Physician communication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring role dialectics in inter-service admission handoffs: a qualitative analysis of physician communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver