Extending the "p" perspective

An institutional account of management research in Australia

Yue Wang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In commenting Meyer's article "Asian management research needs more self-confidence" in APJM (2006), Yang and Terjesen (Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4):497-507, 2007) described ground realities in Australia that may have inhibited the development of a robust management research community. As an Australia-trained and Australia-based Asian management scholar, I extend the "P" perspective by exploring how the formal and informal institutions interact in shaping Australia-based scholars' publication strategies and research performance. Reflecting on my experience in Australia, I argue that like in any other businesses, institutions matter in our business of research and publication. They matter because they can shape the local "rule of the game" within which a country's or a region's scholars conduct and publish their research. A full institutional account of the current state of management research in the Asia Pacific region requires a deeper understanding of both formal and informal local institutions. From such an institutional perspective, this commentary concentrates on why Australian management research lags behind that in the US and Europe and yet leads the Asia Pacific region.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-360
Number of pages8
JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Management
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Extending the "p" perspective: An institutional account of management research in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this