Abstract
The South African Special Investigating Units and Special Tribunals Act (SIU Act) empowered the President to establish Special Investigating Units with wide powers to investigate allegations of corruption - in South African Association of Personal Injury Lawyers v Heath, the Court found that the functions conferred on a judge by the SIU Act did compromise the separation of the courts from other arms of government - blurred the line between the courts and other branches of government, undermining the independence of the judiciary - the Constitutional Court of South Africa was influenced by some recent Australian cases in which the High Court had tested the permissibility of extra-judicial service on the part of federal judges by investigating its compatibility with judicial office - how the incompatibility principle is used in Australia - whether the interests served by the separation of the courts from other arms of government are really served by the incompatibility test.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 181-200 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2003 |