Ezekiel 16 and its use of allegory and the disclosure-of-abomination formula

Istvan Haag*, Stephen Llewelyn, Jack Tsonis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Ezek 16 and 23 have been subjected recently to much critical review, especially from feminist scholars. The present article acknowledges their work but seeks to take the discussion back to a formal analysis of the image of the adulterous wife, with a special focus on Ezek 16 and its use of the 'disclosure of abomination' formula. The use of this formula locates the oracle within the legal register but framed in terms of a unilateral covenant. The effect of such a formula and its employment is to silence the woman and give only the accuser/judge a voice. But the use of the formula is figurative and plays to the larger allegorical function of the oracle which, it is argued, places the prophet towards the literate end of the oracy/literacy continuum.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-210
Number of pages13
JournalVetus Testamentum
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2012


Dive into the research topics of 'Ezekiel 16 and its use of allegory and the disclosure-of-abomination formula'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this