Abstract
Background Decision-making concerning risk-reducing mastectomy for women at hereditary risk of breast cancer entails complex personal choices. Deciding whether and how to restore breast shape after risk-reducing mastectomy is a key part of this process. We developed a web-based decision aid, BRECONDA (Breast Reconstruction Decision Aid), to assist women in decision-making regarding breast reconstruction. Method This study assessed the efficacy of BRECONDA to assist women at increased risk of breast cancer in making decisions regarding risk-reducing mastectomy in terms of decisional conflict, knowledge, and satisfaction with information. Women at hereditary risk of breast cancer (N = 64) were recruited into this randomized controlled trial from four Australian hereditary cancer clinics. Participants initially provided online consent and completed baseline questionnaires assessing decisional conflict, knowledge, and satisfaction with information. They were then randomly assigned to either: 1) Intervention – unlimited access to BRECONDA, with usual care; or, 2) Control – usual care. At 2-months follow-up (N = 60) the outcomes were re-assessed. Intervention participants also completed user acceptability ratings for the intervention overall and specific key modules. Results MANCOVA analyses indicated that Intervention participants reported lower decisional conflict (P = 0.027), and greater knowledge (P = 0.019) and satisfaction with information (P < 0.0005) at 2-months follow-up compared with Controls. Intervention participants reported high user acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention. Conclusion BRECONDA benefits women considering risk-reducing mastectomy by reducing decisional conflict, and improving knowledge and satisfaction with information. These benefits, coupled with high user acceptability, demonstrate the feasibility of implementing BRECONDA in the hereditary cancer risk context.
Language | English |
---|---|
Pages | 79-85 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Breast |
Volume | 36 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2017 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Breast cancer
- Decision aid
- Decision-making
- Decisional conflict
- Hereditary risk
- Randomized controlled trial
Cite this
}
Facilitating decision-making in women undergoing genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer : BRECONDA randomized controlled trial results. / Sherman, Kerry A.; Kilby, Christopher J.; Shaw, Laura Kate; Winch, Caleb; Kirk, Judy; Tucker, Kathy; Elder, Elisabeth.
In: Breast, Vol. 36, 01.12.2017, p. 79-85.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Facilitating decision-making in women undergoing genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer
T2 - Breast
AU - Sherman, Kerry A.
AU - Kilby, Christopher J.
AU - Shaw, Laura Kate
AU - Winch, Caleb
AU - Kirk, Judy
AU - Tucker, Kathy
AU - Elder, Elisabeth
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Background Decision-making concerning risk-reducing mastectomy for women at hereditary risk of breast cancer entails complex personal choices. Deciding whether and how to restore breast shape after risk-reducing mastectomy is a key part of this process. We developed a web-based decision aid, BRECONDA (Breast Reconstruction Decision Aid), to assist women in decision-making regarding breast reconstruction. Method This study assessed the efficacy of BRECONDA to assist women at increased risk of breast cancer in making decisions regarding risk-reducing mastectomy in terms of decisional conflict, knowledge, and satisfaction with information. Women at hereditary risk of breast cancer (N = 64) were recruited into this randomized controlled trial from four Australian hereditary cancer clinics. Participants initially provided online consent and completed baseline questionnaires assessing decisional conflict, knowledge, and satisfaction with information. They were then randomly assigned to either: 1) Intervention – unlimited access to BRECONDA, with usual care; or, 2) Control – usual care. At 2-months follow-up (N = 60) the outcomes were re-assessed. Intervention participants also completed user acceptability ratings for the intervention overall and specific key modules. Results MANCOVA analyses indicated that Intervention participants reported lower decisional conflict (P = 0.027), and greater knowledge (P = 0.019) and satisfaction with information (P < 0.0005) at 2-months follow-up compared with Controls. Intervention participants reported high user acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention. Conclusion BRECONDA benefits women considering risk-reducing mastectomy by reducing decisional conflict, and improving knowledge and satisfaction with information. These benefits, coupled with high user acceptability, demonstrate the feasibility of implementing BRECONDA in the hereditary cancer risk context.
AB - Background Decision-making concerning risk-reducing mastectomy for women at hereditary risk of breast cancer entails complex personal choices. Deciding whether and how to restore breast shape after risk-reducing mastectomy is a key part of this process. We developed a web-based decision aid, BRECONDA (Breast Reconstruction Decision Aid), to assist women in decision-making regarding breast reconstruction. Method This study assessed the efficacy of BRECONDA to assist women at increased risk of breast cancer in making decisions regarding risk-reducing mastectomy in terms of decisional conflict, knowledge, and satisfaction with information. Women at hereditary risk of breast cancer (N = 64) were recruited into this randomized controlled trial from four Australian hereditary cancer clinics. Participants initially provided online consent and completed baseline questionnaires assessing decisional conflict, knowledge, and satisfaction with information. They were then randomly assigned to either: 1) Intervention – unlimited access to BRECONDA, with usual care; or, 2) Control – usual care. At 2-months follow-up (N = 60) the outcomes were re-assessed. Intervention participants also completed user acceptability ratings for the intervention overall and specific key modules. Results MANCOVA analyses indicated that Intervention participants reported lower decisional conflict (P = 0.027), and greater knowledge (P = 0.019) and satisfaction with information (P < 0.0005) at 2-months follow-up compared with Controls. Intervention participants reported high user acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention. Conclusion BRECONDA benefits women considering risk-reducing mastectomy by reducing decisional conflict, and improving knowledge and satisfaction with information. These benefits, coupled with high user acceptability, demonstrate the feasibility of implementing BRECONDA in the hereditary cancer risk context.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Decision aid
KW - Decision-making
KW - Decisional conflict
KW - Hereditary risk
KW - Randomized controlled trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030978677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.001
DO - 10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.001
M3 - Article
VL - 36
SP - 79
EP - 85
JO - Breast
JF - Breast
SN - 0960-9776
ER -