TY - JOUR
T1 - Facilitation and Interference from Formally Similar Word Primes in a Naming Task
AU - Pexman, Penny M.
AU - Cristi, Carolina
AU - Lupker, Stephen J.
PY - 1999/2
Y1 - 1999/2
N2 - The naming of a word (e.g., CAVE) is delayed if participants first name a formally similar, but nonrhyming, prime (e.g., HAVE). Taraban and McClelland (1987) interpreted this effect in terms of competition between activated phonological codes, while Bradshaw and Nettleton (1974) argued that these interference effects are due to conflicting output codes and only arise when primes are named. Experiment 1 shows interference effects for nonrhyming primes read silently (e.g., HAVE-CAVE), contrary to Bradshaw and Nettleton's claim, but rhyming primes (e.g., NEED-WEED) produced no facilitation, contrary to predictions from Taraban and McClelland's model. In Experiment 2 participants named both prime and target, and both interference and facilitation were observed. In Experiment 3 formally dissimilar rhyming prime-target pairs (e.g., EIGHT-HATE) produced no facilitation even when primes were named. Both interference and facilitation effects seem to result from a complicated interaction of orthographic, phonological, and output codes.
AB - The naming of a word (e.g., CAVE) is delayed if participants first name a formally similar, but nonrhyming, prime (e.g., HAVE). Taraban and McClelland (1987) interpreted this effect in terms of competition between activated phonological codes, while Bradshaw and Nettleton (1974) argued that these interference effects are due to conflicting output codes and only arise when primes are named. Experiment 1 shows interference effects for nonrhyming primes read silently (e.g., HAVE-CAVE), contrary to Bradshaw and Nettleton's claim, but rhyming primes (e.g., NEED-WEED) produced no facilitation, contrary to predictions from Taraban and McClelland's model. In Experiment 2 participants named both prime and target, and both interference and facilitation were observed. In Experiment 3 formally dissimilar rhyming prime-target pairs (e.g., EIGHT-HATE) produced no facilitation even when primes were named. Both interference and facilitation effects seem to result from a complicated interaction of orthographic, phonological, and output codes.
KW - Orthography
KW - Phonology
KW - Priming
KW - Word naming
KW - Word recognition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007875784&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/jmla.1998.2617
DO - 10.1006/jmla.1998.2617
M3 - Article
VL - 40
SP - 195
EP - 229
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
SN - 0749-596X
IS - 2
ER -