Factors influencing resource users and managers' perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya

Timothy McClanahan, Jamie Davies, Joseph Maina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Non-compliance with marine protected area (MPA) regulations is a problem worldwide, and this is being addressed through community programmes. Park service and fisheries department personnel, and fishers living adjacent to three parks were studied to determine their perceptions of MPAs. The hypotheses that positive perceptions towards the management of fisheries exclusion and gear-restricted areas would increase with the wealth, education, age and years of employment of the person, the history of community participation and the age of the MPA were tested. The strongest factor was employment, with fishers having significantly less positive perceptions towards areas closed to fishing than government managers, although all groups agreed area management benefited the nation. Government personnel thought that fishers and their communities benefited from area management, while most fishers did not share this view. Increasing wealth or community participation were not significant factors, but secondary education was associated with more positive perceptions of area management. Fishers adjacent to the oldest MPA held significantly more positive perceptions than fishers living adjacent to the newest MPA, although only a slight majority agreed that they and their communities benefited. The results point to a need for patience in expecting change in resource users' perceptions, adopting an approach in which there is more communication between fishers and managers, so that both are more aware of MPA functions, particularly closed areas and the indirect benefits.

LanguageEnglish
Pages42-49
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Conservation
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Kenya
protected area
Fisheries
Managers
resource
Education
local participation
Personnel
History
Communication
fishery
Gears
secondary education
fishing
education
communication
Community Participation
history

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Closed-area management
  • Gear-restricted management
  • Park personnel
  • Park-people conflicts
  • Perceived benefits
  • Resource users

Cite this

@article{a66a588949d4452b92f6bb276ea4ea05,
title = "Factors influencing resource users and managers' perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya",
abstract = "Non-compliance with marine protected area (MPA) regulations is a problem worldwide, and this is being addressed through community programmes. Park service and fisheries department personnel, and fishers living adjacent to three parks were studied to determine their perceptions of MPAs. The hypotheses that positive perceptions towards the management of fisheries exclusion and gear-restricted areas would increase with the wealth, education, age and years of employment of the person, the history of community participation and the age of the MPA were tested. The strongest factor was employment, with fishers having significantly less positive perceptions towards areas closed to fishing than government managers, although all groups agreed area management benefited the nation. Government personnel thought that fishers and their communities benefited from area management, while most fishers did not share this view. Increasing wealth or community participation were not significant factors, but secondary education was associated with more positive perceptions of area management. Fishers adjacent to the oldest MPA held significantly more positive perceptions than fishers living adjacent to the newest MPA, although only a slight majority agreed that they and their communities benefited. The results point to a need for patience in expecting change in resource users' perceptions, adopting an approach in which there is more communication between fishers and managers, so that both are more aware of MPA functions, particularly closed areas and the indirect benefits.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Closed-area management, Gear-restricted management, Park personnel, Park-people conflicts, Perceived benefits, Resource users",
author = "Timothy McClanahan and Jamie Davies and Joseph Maina",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1017/S0376892904001791",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "42--49",
journal = "Environmental Conservation",
issn = "0376-8929",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

Factors influencing resource users and managers' perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya. / McClanahan, Timothy; Davies, Jamie; Maina, Joseph.

In: Environmental Conservation, Vol. 32, No. 1, 03.2005, p. 42-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors influencing resource users and managers' perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya

AU - McClanahan, Timothy

AU - Davies, Jamie

AU - Maina, Joseph

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Non-compliance with marine protected area (MPA) regulations is a problem worldwide, and this is being addressed through community programmes. Park service and fisheries department personnel, and fishers living adjacent to three parks were studied to determine their perceptions of MPAs. The hypotheses that positive perceptions towards the management of fisheries exclusion and gear-restricted areas would increase with the wealth, education, age and years of employment of the person, the history of community participation and the age of the MPA were tested. The strongest factor was employment, with fishers having significantly less positive perceptions towards areas closed to fishing than government managers, although all groups agreed area management benefited the nation. Government personnel thought that fishers and their communities benefited from area management, while most fishers did not share this view. Increasing wealth or community participation were not significant factors, but secondary education was associated with more positive perceptions of area management. Fishers adjacent to the oldest MPA held significantly more positive perceptions than fishers living adjacent to the newest MPA, although only a slight majority agreed that they and their communities benefited. The results point to a need for patience in expecting change in resource users' perceptions, adopting an approach in which there is more communication between fishers and managers, so that both are more aware of MPA functions, particularly closed areas and the indirect benefits.

AB - Non-compliance with marine protected area (MPA) regulations is a problem worldwide, and this is being addressed through community programmes. Park service and fisheries department personnel, and fishers living adjacent to three parks were studied to determine their perceptions of MPAs. The hypotheses that positive perceptions towards the management of fisheries exclusion and gear-restricted areas would increase with the wealth, education, age and years of employment of the person, the history of community participation and the age of the MPA were tested. The strongest factor was employment, with fishers having significantly less positive perceptions towards areas closed to fishing than government managers, although all groups agreed area management benefited the nation. Government personnel thought that fishers and their communities benefited from area management, while most fishers did not share this view. Increasing wealth or community participation were not significant factors, but secondary education was associated with more positive perceptions of area management. Fishers adjacent to the oldest MPA held significantly more positive perceptions than fishers living adjacent to the newest MPA, although only a slight majority agreed that they and their communities benefited. The results point to a need for patience in expecting change in resource users' perceptions, adopting an approach in which there is more communication between fishers and managers, so that both are more aware of MPA functions, particularly closed areas and the indirect benefits.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Closed-area management

KW - Gear-restricted management

KW - Park personnel

KW - Park-people conflicts

KW - Perceived benefits

KW - Resource users

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22344446956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0376892904001791

DO - 10.1017/S0376892904001791

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 42

EP - 49

JO - Environmental Conservation

T2 - Environmental Conservation

JF - Environmental Conservation

SN - 0376-8929

IS - 1

ER -