Fake news: rebuilding the epistemic landscape

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The blame for fake news obviously lies with the producers. It is plausible, nevertheless, that consumers have a responsibility to avoid fake news, to engage in fact-checking, or to seek multiple sources, including sources with different ideologies. This chapter argues that these strategies have limited utility and if the problem of fake news is to be effectively addressed, we need responses at the supply end, not the consumption end. Since suppliers, who are often ill motivated, cannot be expected to offer or consent to these responses, we need effective regulation or control of sources. The author sketches proposals compatible with maintaining the rights of everyone to free speech.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOxford handbook of digital ethics
EditorsCarissa Véliz
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780191890437
ISBN (Print)9780198857815
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Nov 2021

Keywords

  • fake news
  • epistemic pollution
  • belief
  • higher-order evidence
  • regulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fake news: rebuilding the epistemic landscape'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this