Female slave vs female slave

המאand החפש in the Hebrew Bible

Edward J. Bridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study of אָמָה and שִׁפְחָה shows that there is no inherent distinction in meaning between the two terms, due to the intertwining of context of use and text genre. Both are used for slave wives in Genesis, in legislation contexts, in deferential language by women, in property lists, and in relation to the master or mistress. Yet patterns of use occur. אָמָה predominates in legislation and marriage contexts; and שִׁפְחָה predominates in Genesis and when generally designating female slaves.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Hebrew scriptures
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Bibliographical note

Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Female slave vs female slave: המאand החפש in the Hebrew Bible'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this