Feminism as critique in the neoliberal age: debating Nancy Fraser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Neoliberalism, we are told, has “seduced” feminism. What is meant is that the libertarian and democratic hopes that have scoped this radical social movement have been reconfigured and re-energised by neoliberal project that models all our freedoms upon the market. Misgivings about “seductions” and “betrayals” require that feminist theory adopts the role of the arbiter on goals and meanings and this puts strains upon its deep commitment to democratic epistemologies. The following paper finds that the leading theorist of feminism as critique in a neoliberal age has failed to fully grasp the normative tension that is involved. Nancy Fraser fails to rethink the tasks of critique in terms that is sufficient to its role as arbiter on meanings. I suggest that this rethinking might be done without betraying the demands of a democratic epistemology if we reconstruct the emancipatory idealisations that underpin Fraser’s account of a democratic epistemology. While this rendering of feminism as critique retrieves a representation of feminist ideals that might unmask neoliberal distortions, it does so without betraying the responsiveness to self-interpreted needs that is also claimed by a critical and democratic feminist theory.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-17
Number of pages17
JournalCritical Horizons
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date11 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

feminism
epistemology
social movement
neoliberalism
commitment
market
Epistemology
Debating
Nancy Fraser
Feminism
Feminist Theory
Seduction
Social Movements
Neoliberalism
Misgivings
Ideal
Theorists
Rendering
Idealization
Responsiveness

Cite this

@article{f8ef460c4cde4b8aadd2352ff1ad003d,
title = "Feminism as critique in the neoliberal age: debating Nancy Fraser",
abstract = "Neoliberalism, we are told, has “seduced” feminism. What is meant is that the libertarian and democratic hopes that have scoped this radical social movement have been reconfigured and re-energised by neoliberal project that models all our freedoms upon the market. Misgivings about “seductions” and “betrayals” require that feminist theory adopts the role of the arbiter on goals and meanings and this puts strains upon its deep commitment to democratic epistemologies. The following paper finds that the leading theorist of feminism as critique in a neoliberal age has failed to fully grasp the normative tension that is involved. Nancy Fraser fails to rethink the tasks of critique in terms that is sufficient to its role as arbiter on meanings. I suggest that this rethinking might be done without betraying the demands of a democratic epistemology if we reconstruct the emancipatory idealisations that underpin Fraser’s account of a democratic epistemology. While this rendering of feminism as critique retrieves a representation of feminist ideals that might unmask neoliberal distortions, it does so without betraying the responsiveness to self-interpreted needs that is also claimed by a critical and democratic feminist theory.",
keywords = "feminism, neoliberalism, Nancy Fraser, critique",
author = "Pauline Johnson",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14409917.2017.1376937",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "Critical Horizons",
issn = "1440-9917",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "1",

}

Feminism as critique in the neoliberal age : debating Nancy Fraser. / Johnson, Pauline.

In: Critical Horizons, Vol. 19, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feminism as critique in the neoliberal age

T2 - Critical Horizons

AU - Johnson,Pauline

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - Neoliberalism, we are told, has “seduced” feminism. What is meant is that the libertarian and democratic hopes that have scoped this radical social movement have been reconfigured and re-energised by neoliberal project that models all our freedoms upon the market. Misgivings about “seductions” and “betrayals” require that feminist theory adopts the role of the arbiter on goals and meanings and this puts strains upon its deep commitment to democratic epistemologies. The following paper finds that the leading theorist of feminism as critique in a neoliberal age has failed to fully grasp the normative tension that is involved. Nancy Fraser fails to rethink the tasks of critique in terms that is sufficient to its role as arbiter on meanings. I suggest that this rethinking might be done without betraying the demands of a democratic epistemology if we reconstruct the emancipatory idealisations that underpin Fraser’s account of a democratic epistemology. While this rendering of feminism as critique retrieves a representation of feminist ideals that might unmask neoliberal distortions, it does so without betraying the responsiveness to self-interpreted needs that is also claimed by a critical and democratic feminist theory.

AB - Neoliberalism, we are told, has “seduced” feminism. What is meant is that the libertarian and democratic hopes that have scoped this radical social movement have been reconfigured and re-energised by neoliberal project that models all our freedoms upon the market. Misgivings about “seductions” and “betrayals” require that feminist theory adopts the role of the arbiter on goals and meanings and this puts strains upon its deep commitment to democratic epistemologies. The following paper finds that the leading theorist of feminism as critique in a neoliberal age has failed to fully grasp the normative tension that is involved. Nancy Fraser fails to rethink the tasks of critique in terms that is sufficient to its role as arbiter on meanings. I suggest that this rethinking might be done without betraying the demands of a democratic epistemology if we reconstruct the emancipatory idealisations that underpin Fraser’s account of a democratic epistemology. While this rendering of feminism as critique retrieves a representation of feminist ideals that might unmask neoliberal distortions, it does so without betraying the responsiveness to self-interpreted needs that is also claimed by a critical and democratic feminist theory.

KW - feminism

KW - neoliberalism

KW - Nancy Fraser

KW - critique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031101039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14409917.2017.1376937

DO - 10.1080/14409917.2017.1376937

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Critical Horizons

JF - Critical Horizons

SN - 1440-9917

IS - 1

ER -