Ferropericlase - A lower mantle phase in the upper mantle

Gerhard P. Brey*, Vadim Bulatov, Andrei Girnis, Jeff W. Harris, Thomas Stachel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Experiments on compositions along the join MgO-NaA3+ Si2O6 (A=Al, Cr, Fe3+) show that sodium can be incorporated into ferropericlase at upper mantle pressures in amounts commonly found in natural diamond inclusions. These results, combined with the observed mineral parageneses of several diamond inclusion suites, establish firmly that ferropericlase exists in the upper mantle in regions with low silica activity. Such regions may be carbonated dunite or stalled and degassed carbonatitic melts. Ferropericlase as an inclusion in diamond on its own is not indicative of a lower mantle origin or of a deep mantle plume. Coexisting phases have to be taken into consideration to decide on the depth of origin. The composition of olivine will indicate an origin from the upper mantle or border of the transition zone to the lower mantle and whether it coexisted with ferropericlase in the upper mantle or as ringwoodite. The narrow and flat three phase loop at the border transition zone-lower mantle together with hybrid peridotite plus eclogite/sediments provides an explanation for the varying and Fe-rich nature of the diamond inclusion suite from Sao Luiz, Brazil.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)655-663
Number of pages9
JournalLithos
Volume77
Issue number1-4 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Diamond
  • Ferropericlase
  • Inclusions
  • Lower mantle
  • Olivine
  • Upper mantle

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ferropericlase - A lower mantle phase in the upper mantle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Brey, G. P., Bulatov, V., Girnis, A., Harris, J. W., & Stachel, T. (2004). Ferropericlase - A lower mantle phase in the upper mantle. Lithos, 77(1-4 SPEC. ISS.), 655-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2004.03.013