Fine-scale responses of mobile invertebrates and mesopredatory fish to habitat configuration

Brendan S. Lanham*, Alistair G. B. Poore, Paul E. Gribben

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As habitat-forming species continue to decline globally, it is important to understand how associated communities respond to habitat loss and fragmentation. Changes in the density and spatial configuration of habitat have important consequences for associated communities. However, tests of these factors are often confounded by morphological variation of habitat-formers, which can be resolved by using standardised habitat-mimics. Furthermore, few studies have incorporated the role of predators in mediating the observed effects. To test whether predators mediate the abundance of invertebrates among algal habitats of varying configuration (isolated vs patches, and positions within patches), we placed macroalgal mimics into subtidal estuarine habitats for one month to sample epifaunal communities. At the same time, we conducted underwater video surveys of fish communities to quantify fish communities and their feeding behaviour among the artificial habitats. Isolated habitats did not differ from patch habitats, however, patch edges had the highest epifaunal abundance, where fish were least commonly observed. Observed fish feeding was highest in the middle of patches and increased fish observations and feeding in habitats with reduced epifaunal communities suggest that mesopredatory fish are mediating epifauna in patches, with predation pressure altered by the spatial configuration of the habitat. This contrasts to previous studies that focus on predators that congregate outside patches and suggest that fragmentation leads to reduced invertebrate abundance at habitat edges in contrast to centres. However, this study highlights that in habitat patches housing small mesopredators that also benefit from the increased structure, the centre of the patch experiences higher predation and therefore fewer epifauna in contrast to patch edges and individual algal mimics.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105319
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalMarine Environmental Research
Volume168
Early online date27 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Spatial configuration
  • Fish
  • Predation
  • Epifauna
  • Macroalgae
  • Mimic habitat

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fine-scale responses of mobile invertebrates and mesopredatory fish to habitat configuration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this