FinTech governance: developing laws that calibrate innovation and efficiency with consumer welfare and financial market stability

Niloufer Selvadurai

FinTech governance

developing laws that calibrate innovation and efficiency with consumer welfare and financial market stability

Niloufer Selvadurai

Macquarie Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

Discusses, by means of a comparative analysis, how laws aimed at regulating FinTech developments might be designed to balance the need for financial innovation and economic efficiency against issues of market stability and consumer welfare. Review the nature of FinTech operations, and the regulatory responses of the UK, Germany, the US, Australia and China. Considers why the US regime may offer the most effective regulatory template.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	141-148
Number of pages	8
Journal	Computer and telecommunications law review
Volume	25
Issue number	5
Publication status	Published - 2019

Keywords

Australia
China
comparative law
consumer-welfarism
financial regulation
FinTech
Germany
innovation
market operation
United States

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'FinTech governance: developing laws that calibrate innovation and efficiency with consumer welfare and financial market stability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{d5ff507fadbb434ebe550a28bb198822,

title = "FinTech governance: developing laws that calibrate innovation and efficiency with consumer welfare and financial market stability",

abstract = "Discusses, by means of a comparative analysis, how laws aimed at regulating FinTech developments might be designed to balance the need for financial innovation and economic efficiency against issues of market stability and consumer welfare. Review the nature of FinTech operations, and the regulatory responses of the UK, Germany, the US, Australia and China. Considers why the US regime may offer the most effective regulatory template.",

keywords = "Australia, China, comparative law, consumer-welfarism, financial regulation, FinTech, Germany, innovation, market operation, United States",

author = "Niloufer Selvadurai",

year = "2019",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

pages = "141--148",

journal = "Computer and telecommunications law review",

issn = "1357-3128",

publisher = "Sweet & Maxwell",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - FinTech governance

T2 - developing laws that calibrate innovation and efficiency with consumer welfare and financial market stability

AU - Selvadurai, Niloufer

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Discusses, by means of a comparative analysis, how laws aimed at regulating FinTech developments might be designed to balance the need for financial innovation and economic efficiency against issues of market stability and consumer welfare. Review the nature of FinTech operations, and the regulatory responses of the UK, Germany, the US, Australia and China. Considers why the US regime may offer the most effective regulatory template.

AB - Discusses, by means of a comparative analysis, how laws aimed at regulating FinTech developments might be designed to balance the need for financial innovation and economic efficiency against issues of market stability and consumer welfare. Review the nature of FinTech operations, and the regulatory responses of the UK, Germany, the US, Australia and China. Considers why the US regime may offer the most effective regulatory template.

KW - Australia

KW - China

KW - comparative law

KW - consumer-welfarism

KW - financial regulation

KW - FinTech

KW - Germany

KW - innovation

KW - market operation

KW - United States

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 141

EP - 148

JO - Computer and telecommunications law review

JF - Computer and telecommunications law review

SN - 1357-3128

IS - 5

ER -