FinTech governance

developing laws that calibrate innovation and efficiency with consumer welfare and financial market stability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Discusses, by means of a comparative analysis, how laws aimed at regulating FinTech developments might be designed to balance the need for financial innovation and economic efficiency against issues of market stability and consumer welfare. Review the nature of FinTech operations, and the regulatory responses of the UK, Germany, the US, Australia and China. Considers why the US regime may offer the most effective regulatory template.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-148
Number of pages8
JournalComputer and telecommunications law review
Volume25
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Australia
  • China
  • comparative law
  • consumer-welfarism
  • financial regulation
  • FinTech
  • Germany
  • innovation
  • market operation
  • United States

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'FinTech governance: developing laws that calibrate innovation and efficiency with consumer welfare and financial market stability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this