Abstract
Discusses, by means of a comparative analysis, how laws aimed at regulating FinTech developments might be designed to balance the need for financial innovation and economic efficiency against issues of market stability and consumer welfare. Review the nature of FinTech operations, and the regulatory responses of the UK, Germany, the US, Australia and China. Considers why the US regime may offer the most effective regulatory template.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 141-148 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Computer and telecommunications law review |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Australia
- China
- comparative law
- consumer-welfarism
- financial regulation
- FinTech
- Germany
- innovation
- market operation
- United States