Fish sentience-denial

muddying the waters

Lynne U. Sneddon, Javier Lopez-Luna, David C. C. Wolfenden, Matthew C. Leach, Ana M. Valentim, Peter J. Steenbergen, Nabila Bardine, Amanda D. Currie, Donald M. Broom, Culum Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/opinion

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recent empirical studies have reported evidence that many aquatic species, including fish, cephalopods and crustaceans, have the capacity for nociception and pain, and that their welfare should be taken into consideration. Some sceptics, rejecting the precautionary principle, have denied that any study demonstrates pain or other aspects of sentience in fish. This target article discusses some of the scientific shortcomings of these critiques through a detailed analysis of a study exploring nociception and analgesia in larval zebrafish.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalAnimal sentience
Volume3
Issue number21
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2018. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Cite this

Sneddon, L. U., Lopez-Luna, J., Wolfenden, D. C. C., Leach, M. C., Valentim, A. M., Steenbergen, P. J., ... Brown, C. (2018). Fish sentience-denial: muddying the waters. Animal sentience, 3(21), 1-11. [1].