Fish sentience-denial: muddying the waters

Lynne U. Sneddon; Javier Lopez-Luna; David C. C. Wolfenden; Matthew C. Leach; Ana M. Valentim; Peter J. Steenbergen; Nabila Bardine; Amanda D. Currie; Donald M. Broom; Culum Brown

Fish sentience-denial: muddying the waters

Lynne U. Sneddon, Javier Lopez-Luna, David C. C. Wolfenden, Matthew C. Leach, Ana M. Valentim, Peter J. Steenbergen, Nabila Bardine, Amanda D. Currie, Donald M. Broom, Culum Brown

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/opinion › peer-review

287 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recent empirical studies have reported evidence that many aquatic species, including fish, cephalopods and crustaceans, have the capacity for nociception and pain, and that their welfare should be taken into consideration. Some sceptics, rejecting the precautionary principle, have denied that any study demonstrates pain or other aspects of sentience in fish. This target article discusses some of the scientific shortcomings of these critiques through a detailed analysis of a study exploring nociception and analgesia in larval zebrafish.

Original language	English
Article number	1
Pages (from-to)	1-11
Number of pages	11
Journal	Animal Sentience
Volume	3
Issue number	21
Publication status	Published - 2018

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2018. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Access to Document

Publisher version (open access)Final published version, 481 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

https://animalstudiesrepository.org/animsent/vol3/iss21/1/Licence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@article{3dcd65914c954c678a740f60789c5acf,

title = "Fish sentience-denial: muddying the waters",

abstract = "Recent empirical studies have reported evidence that many aquatic species, including fish, cephalopods and crustaceans, have the capacity for nociception and pain, and that their welfare should be taken into consideration. Some sceptics, rejecting the precautionary principle, have denied that any study demonstrates pain or other aspects of sentience in fish. This target article discusses some of the scientific shortcomings of these critiques through a detailed analysis of a study exploring nociception and analgesia in larval zebrafish. ",

author = "Sneddon, \{Lynne U.\} and Javier Lopez-Luna and Wolfenden, \{David C. C.\} and Leach, \{Matthew C.\} and Valentim, \{Ana M.\} and Steenbergen, \{Peter J.\} and Nabila Bardine and Currie, \{Amanda D.\} and Broom, \{Donald M.\} and Culum Brown",

note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2018. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher. ",

year = "2018",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

pages = "1--11",

journal = "Animal Sentience",

issn = "2377-7478",

publisher = "WellBeing International",

number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fish sentience-denial

T2 - muddying the waters

AU - Sneddon, Lynne U.

AU - Lopez-Luna, Javier

AU - Wolfenden, David C. C.

AU - Leach, Matthew C.

AU - Valentim, Ana M.

AU - Steenbergen, Peter J.

AU - Bardine, Nabila

AU - Currie, Amanda D.

AU - Broom, Donald M.

AU - Brown, Culum

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2018. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Recent empirical studies have reported evidence that many aquatic species, including fish, cephalopods and crustaceans, have the capacity for nociception and pain, and that their welfare should be taken into consideration. Some sceptics, rejecting the precautionary principle, have denied that any study demonstrates pain or other aspects of sentience in fish. This target article discusses some of the scientific shortcomings of these critiques through a detailed analysis of a study exploring nociception and analgesia in larval zebrafish.

AB - Recent empirical studies have reported evidence that many aquatic species, including fish, cephalopods and crustaceans, have the capacity for nociception and pain, and that their welfare should be taken into consideration. Some sceptics, rejecting the precautionary principle, have denied that any study demonstrates pain or other aspects of sentience in fish. This target article discusses some of the scientific shortcomings of these critiques through a detailed analysis of a study exploring nociception and analgesia in larval zebrafish.

UR - https://animalstudiesrepository.org/animsent/policies.html#rights

M3 - Comment/opinion

SN - 2377-7478

VL - 3

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Animal Sentience

JF - Animal Sentience

IS - 21

M1 - 1

ER -

Fish sentience-denial: muddying the waters

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this