Abstract
The most consistent definition of fitness makes it a static property of organisms. However, this is not how fitness is used in many evolutionary models. In those models, fitness is permitted to vary with an organism’s circumstances. According to this second conception, fitness is dynamic. There is consequently tension between these two conceptions of fitness. One recently proposed solution suggests resorting to conditional properties. We argue, however, that this solution is unsatisfactory. Using a very simple model, we show that it can lead to incompatible fitness values and indecision about whether selection actually occurs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 112 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-20 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | European Journal for Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2021 |
Keywords
- Causation
- Evolutionary theory
- Explanation
- Fitness
- Natural selection
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fitness: static or dynamic?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver