Fixed or random effects meta-analysis?: Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness

Catalin Tufanaru, Zachary Munn, Matthew Stephenson, Edoardo Aromataris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Systematic review aims to systematically identify, critically appraise, and summarize all relevant studies that match predefined criteria and answer predefined questions. The most common type of systematic review is that assessing the effectiveness of an intervention or therapy. In this article, we discuss some of the common methodological issues that arise when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of effectiveness data, including issues related to study designs, meta-analysis, and the use and interpretation of effect sizes.

LanguageEnglish
Pages196-207
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Effect size
  • Effectiveness
  • Fixed effects
  • Meta-analysis
  • Random effects
  • Systematic review

Cite this

@article{743bec2855d3412887d88ce9519c95ef,
title = "Fixed or random effects meta-analysis?: Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness",
abstract = "Systematic review aims to systematically identify, critically appraise, and summarize all relevant studies that match predefined criteria and answer predefined questions. The most common type of systematic review is that assessing the effectiveness of an intervention or therapy. In this article, we discuss some of the common methodological issues that arise when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of effectiveness data, including issues related to study designs, meta-analysis, and the use and interpretation of effect sizes.",
keywords = "Effect size, Effectiveness, Fixed effects, Meta-analysis, Random effects, Systematic review",
author = "Catalin Tufanaru and Zachary Munn and Matthew Stephenson and Edoardo Aromataris",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/XEB.0000000000000065",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "196--207",
journal = "International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare",
issn = "1744-1595",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness. / Tufanaru, Catalin; Munn, Zachary; Stephenson, Matthew; Aromataris, Edoardo.

In: International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.09.2015, p. 196-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fixed or random effects meta-analysis?

T2 - International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

AU - Tufanaru, Catalin

AU - Munn, Zachary

AU - Stephenson, Matthew

AU - Aromataris, Edoardo

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Systematic review aims to systematically identify, critically appraise, and summarize all relevant studies that match predefined criteria and answer predefined questions. The most common type of systematic review is that assessing the effectiveness of an intervention or therapy. In this article, we discuss some of the common methodological issues that arise when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of effectiveness data, including issues related to study designs, meta-analysis, and the use and interpretation of effect sizes.

AB - Systematic review aims to systematically identify, critically appraise, and summarize all relevant studies that match predefined criteria and answer predefined questions. The most common type of systematic review is that assessing the effectiveness of an intervention or therapy. In this article, we discuss some of the common methodological issues that arise when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of effectiveness data, including issues related to study designs, meta-analysis, and the use and interpretation of effect sizes.

KW - Effect size

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Fixed effects

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Random effects

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966340497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000065

DO - 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000065

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 196

EP - 207

JO - International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

JF - International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

SN - 1744-1595

IS - 3

ER -