Fluid intelligence is supported by the multipledemand system not the language system

Alexandra Woolgar, John Duncan, Facundo Manes, Evelina Fedorenko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A set of frontoparietal brain regions—the multiple-demand (MD) system1,2—has been linked to fluid intelligence in brain imaging3,4 and in studies of patients with brain damage5–7. For example, the amount of damage to frontal or parietal, but not temporal, cortices predicts fluid intelligence deficit5. However, frontal and parietal lobes are structurally8 and functionally9,10 heterogeneous. They contain domain-general regions that respond across diverse tasks11,12, but also specialized regions that respond selectively during language processing13. Since language may be critical for complex thought14–24 (compare with refs 25,26), intelligence loss following damage to the frontoparietal cortex could have important contributions from damage to language-selective regions. To evaluate the relative contributions of MD versus language-selective regions, we employed large functional magnetic resonance imaging datasets to construct probabilistic maps of the two systems. We used these maps to weigh the volume of lesion (in each of 80 patients) falling within each system. MD-weighted, but not language-weighted, lesion volumes predicted fluid intelligence deficit (with the opposite pattern observed for verbal fluency), indicating that fluid intelligence is specifically tied to the MD system, and undermining claims that language is at the core of complex thought.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200–204
Number of pages5
JournalNature Human Behaviour
Volume2
Issue number3
Early online dateJan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Keywords

  • human behaviour
  • intelligence
  • language
  • problem solving

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fluid intelligence is supported by the multipledemand system not the language system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this