Follow-up and review of the Sustainable Development Goals

alignment vs. internalization

Åsa Persson*, Nina Weitz, Måns Nilsson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Follow-up and review arrangements will play a critical role in ensuring that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are effectively implemented, much of which will need to happen at the national level. This article examines the nature of commitments that countries have made and if follow-up and review arrangements currently planned are consistent with those. In particular, we consider the need to encompass both the global SDG targets and the nationally defined targets foreseen. We also discuss the balance between following up and reviewing outcomes vis-à-vis behaviour to achieve those outcomes. Following a review of current plans for follow-up and review, we further draw lessons from principal-agent theory and from the two predecessors of the SDGs, Agenda 21 and the Millennium Development Goals. We conclude that increased attention and visibility of nationally defined and internalized targets is likely to enhance implementation effectiveness, and that they should therefore be accommodated in the follow-up and review systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-68
Number of pages10
JournalReview of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2016. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Follow-up and review of the Sustainable Development Goals: alignment vs. internalization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this