Friendship, recognition and social freedom: a sociological reconstruction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In Freedom’s Right, Axel Honneth articulates the social freedom of friendship with reference to its institutionalised norms. These action norms, however, are not specific to friendship; they apply to modern intimacy per se. Such non-specificity cannot adequately account for the experience of social freedom in friendship. Addressing this issue, I evaluate friendship as a form of recognition and identify a generative recognition deficit functional to its relational autonomy. Then, taking Honneth’s institutional approach to friendship as a point of departure, I ascertain an institutional deficit that both sustains friendship’s autonomy and constrains the generalisability of its social freedom by way of institutional connectivity to heterosexuality. I suggest that only a differentiating approach to friendship that fathoms its extraordinary position among interpersonal relationships can yield new insights. That done, friendship can in turn provide a prism through which to assess the conceptual approaches deployed in its analysis.
LanguageEnglish
Pages198-214
Number of pages17
JournalCritical Horizons
Volume19
Issue number3
Early online date26 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

friendship
reconstruction
deficit
autonomy
heterosexuality
Friendship
intimacy
experience

Keywords

  • friendship
  • Honneth
  • institution
  • intimacy
  • recognition
  • social freedom

Cite this

@article{b004c6c7c83e45958ab9b1e502e04aad,
title = "Friendship, recognition and social freedom: a sociological reconstruction",
abstract = "In Freedom’s Right, Axel Honneth articulates the social freedom of friendship with reference to its institutionalised norms. These action norms, however, are not specific to friendship; they apply to modern intimacy per se. Such non-specificity cannot adequately account for the experience of social freedom in friendship. Addressing this issue, I evaluate friendship as a form of recognition and identify a generative recognition deficit functional to its relational autonomy. Then, taking Honneth’s institutional approach to friendship as a point of departure, I ascertain an institutional deficit that both sustains friendship’s autonomy and constrains the generalisability of its social freedom by way of institutional connectivity to heterosexuality. I suggest that only a differentiating approach to friendship that fathoms its extraordinary position among interpersonal relationships can yield new insights. That done, friendship can in turn provide a prism through which to assess the conceptual approaches deployed in its analysis.",
keywords = "friendship, Honneth, institution, intimacy, recognition, social freedom",
author = "Harry Blatterer",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/14409917.2018.1485247",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "198--214",
journal = "Critical Horizons",
issn = "1440-9917",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "3",

}

Friendship, recognition and social freedom : a sociological reconstruction. / Blatterer, Harry.

In: Critical Horizons, Vol. 19, No. 3, 03.07.2018, p. 198-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Friendship, recognition and social freedom

T2 - Critical Horizons

AU - Blatterer, Harry

PY - 2018/7/3

Y1 - 2018/7/3

N2 - In Freedom’s Right, Axel Honneth articulates the social freedom of friendship with reference to its institutionalised norms. These action norms, however, are not specific to friendship; they apply to modern intimacy per se. Such non-specificity cannot adequately account for the experience of social freedom in friendship. Addressing this issue, I evaluate friendship as a form of recognition and identify a generative recognition deficit functional to its relational autonomy. Then, taking Honneth’s institutional approach to friendship as a point of departure, I ascertain an institutional deficit that both sustains friendship’s autonomy and constrains the generalisability of its social freedom by way of institutional connectivity to heterosexuality. I suggest that only a differentiating approach to friendship that fathoms its extraordinary position among interpersonal relationships can yield new insights. That done, friendship can in turn provide a prism through which to assess the conceptual approaches deployed in its analysis.

AB - In Freedom’s Right, Axel Honneth articulates the social freedom of friendship with reference to its institutionalised norms. These action norms, however, are not specific to friendship; they apply to modern intimacy per se. Such non-specificity cannot adequately account for the experience of social freedom in friendship. Addressing this issue, I evaluate friendship as a form of recognition and identify a generative recognition deficit functional to its relational autonomy. Then, taking Honneth’s institutional approach to friendship as a point of departure, I ascertain an institutional deficit that both sustains friendship’s autonomy and constrains the generalisability of its social freedom by way of institutional connectivity to heterosexuality. I suggest that only a differentiating approach to friendship that fathoms its extraordinary position among interpersonal relationships can yield new insights. That done, friendship can in turn provide a prism through which to assess the conceptual approaches deployed in its analysis.

KW - friendship

KW - Honneth

KW - institution

KW - intimacy

KW - recognition

KW - social freedom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050093880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14409917.2018.1485247

DO - 10.1080/14409917.2018.1485247

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 198

EP - 214

JO - Critical Horizons

JF - Critical Horizons

SN - 1440-9917

IS - 3

ER -