FRM17 decision allows offshore detainee cases to fight on in the Federal Court

George Newhouse; Anna Talbot; Keyvan Dorostkar

doi:10.1177/1037969X20913999

FRM17 decision allows offshore detainee cases to fight on in the Federal Court

George Newhouse^*, Anna Talbot, Keyvan Dorostkar

^*Corresponding author for this work

Macquarie Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

On 28 August 2019, the Full Federal Court of Australia handed down its decision in four test cases selected by the Court as representative of over 50 cases brought on behalf of asylum seekers on Nauru and Papua New Guinea against the Minister for Home Affairs (the test cases). The test cases confirmed that the Federal Court does have the jurisdiction to hear negligence claims brought by immigration transferees offshore, but that the jurisdiction of the Federal Court has limits.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	131-134
Number of pages	4
Journal	Alternative Law Journal
Volume	45
Issue number	2
Early online date	2 Apr 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X20913999
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2020

Keywords

human rights
judicial power
jurisdictions
negligence

Access to Document

10.1177/1037969X20913999

Cite this

@article{1c42f7e2723d48579b64dd013cbc90c4,

title = "FRM17 decision allows offshore detainee cases to fight on in the Federal Court",

abstract = "On 28 August 2019, the Full Federal Court of Australia handed down its decision in four test cases selected by the Court as representative of over 50 cases brought on behalf of asylum seekers on Nauru and Papua New Guinea against the Minister for Home Affairs (the test cases). The test cases confirmed that the Federal Court does have the jurisdiction to hear negligence claims brought by immigration transferees offshore, but that the jurisdiction of the Federal Court has limits.",

keywords = "human rights, judicial power, jurisdictions, negligence",

author = "George Newhouse and Anna Talbot and Keyvan Dorostkar",

year = "2020",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1037969X20913999",

language = "English",

volume = "45",

pages = "131--134",

journal = "Alternative Law Journal",

issn = "1037-969X",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - FRM17 decision allows offshore detainee cases to fight on in the Federal Court

AU - Newhouse, George

AU - Talbot, Anna

AU - Dorostkar, Keyvan

PY - 2020/6/1

Y1 - 2020/6/1

N2 - On 28 August 2019, the Full Federal Court of Australia handed down its decision in four test cases selected by the Court as representative of over 50 cases brought on behalf of asylum seekers on Nauru and Papua New Guinea against the Minister for Home Affairs (the test cases). The test cases confirmed that the Federal Court does have the jurisdiction to hear negligence claims brought by immigration transferees offshore, but that the jurisdiction of the Federal Court has limits.

AB - On 28 August 2019, the Full Federal Court of Australia handed down its decision in four test cases selected by the Court as representative of over 50 cases brought on behalf of asylum seekers on Nauru and Papua New Guinea against the Minister for Home Affairs (the test cases). The test cases confirmed that the Federal Court does have the jurisdiction to hear negligence claims brought by immigration transferees offshore, but that the jurisdiction of the Federal Court has limits.

KW - human rights

KW - judicial power

KW - jurisdictions

KW - negligence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083048447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1037969X20913999

DO - 10.1177/1037969X20913999

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85083048447

SN - 1037-969X

VL - 45

SP - 131

EP - 134

JO - Alternative Law Journal

JF - Alternative Law Journal

IS - 2

ER -

FRM17 decision allows offshore detainee cases to fight on in the Federal Court

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this