From automata to animate beings

the scope and limits of attributing socialness to artificial agents

Ruud Hortensius*, Emily S. Cross

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms and consequences of attributing socialness to artificial agents has important implications for how we can use technology to lead more productive and fulfilling lives. Here, we integrate recent findings on the factors that shape behavioral and brain mechanisms that support social interactions between humans and artificial agents. We review how visual features of an agent, as well as knowledge factors within the human observer, shape attributions across dimensions of socialness. We explore how anthropomorphism and dehumanization further influence how we perceive and interact with artificial agents. Based on these findings, we argue that the cognitive reconstruction within the human observer is likely to be far more crucial in shaping our interactions with artificial agents than previously thought, while the artificial agent’s visual features are possibly of lesser importance. We combine these findings to provide an integrative theoretical account based on the “like me” hypothesis, and discuss the key role played by the Theory-of-Mind network, especially the temporal parietal junction, in the shift from mechanistic to social attributions. We conclude by highlighting outstanding questions on the impact of long-term interactions with artificial agents on the behavioral and brain mechanisms of attributing socialness to these agents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-110
Number of pages18
JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume1426
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • socialness attribution
  • animacy
  • anthropomorphism
  • artificial agents
  • human–robot interaction
  • cognition

Cite this