Abstract
This paper uses neo-institutional theory to exzmine the rise and fall of performance indicators adopted as an element of public accountability by Australian universities. We argue that performance indicators were adopted as a symbolic gesture to satisfy the need for externally conferred legitimacy and to demonstrate accountaiblity to various stakeholders through publication in the university's annual report. Also, because adoption was symbolic and universities were coereced by the Australian Federal Government, the rporting was curtailed when the coercive pressures were relxed or removed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 6-28 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- accountability
- performance indicators
- new public management
- institutional theory