Abstract
The release of Generative AI and its availability to the general population was a game changer. Making Generative AI accessible to members of the public opened up knowledge that was previously guarded by experts. As a result, Generative AI is changing the relationship between AI, patient and clinicians. Ethics guidelines issued by governments lay out what should be considered when implementing AI-enabled healthcare. However, how these guidelines are implemented matters. This perspective reflects on the complexity of the task, and how to go about it. Systems Thinking is a well-suited discipline to the task of implementing AI-enabled healthcare and involves participatory processes. However, given the financial and epistemic power imbalance between the AI technology owners and its users, there is a need for strong stewardship of the process. First Nations of Australia cultural processes offer possible guidance about how to enact this stewardship.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 297 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-6 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | AI and Ethics |
| Volume | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 12 May 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright the Author(s) 2026. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- Decolonizing AI
- Systems Thinking
- Ethics implementation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From the what to the how: why the stewardship of ethics implementation in AI healthcare matters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver