Function, explanation, and other biological concerns

In the target article for this issue, Christie, Brusse, et al. argue that Selected Effects Functions (SEF), at least as currently articulated, often do not explain biological traits. In response, we have collected eight commentaries that challenge various aspects of Christie, Brusse, et al.’s argument. These essays cover an array of significant issues, not just for philosophy of science, but for naturalistic philosophy more generally. In this introductory discussion we highlight what is at stake, how this challenge is addressed in the commentaries, and why we believe this exchange will shape discussions of biological function in the future.