Gender, race, and the insecurity of 'security'

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

‘Security’ is a contested concept in International Relations (IR) and related disciplines. Both in terms of scholarly study and practice, ‘security’ reflects a range of assumptions, knowledges, and concerns about the world and the people in it. Security Studies (SS) emerged as a subfield of IR during the Cold War period, dominated largely by realist understandings of the world. Concerned with what was assumed to be the ‘aggressive’ nature of humans and a state system that was rooted in the anarchical, realists (and later neorealists) were concerned with securing the nation-state from outside the boundaries of the national community. While the field has taken broader approaches to ‘security’ (and other related concerns), the function of the state as protector is largely unproblematized. Engaging with mainstream SS entails acknowledging the field’s relationship with the assumptions and logics of mainstream IR more broadly, and how the logics of SS and security-as-practice interact with broader (historical and contemporary) gendered and racialized discourses of global politics, and ultimately function to enable and perpetuate violence.

LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge handbook of gender and security
EditorsCaron E. Gentry, Laura J. Shepherd, Laura Sjoberg
Place of PublicationLondon ; New York
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Chapter3
Pages37-47
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781315525082, 9781315525099
ISBN (Print)9781138696211
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

gender
international relations
nation state
cold war
violence
politics
discourse
community
International Relations
Logic
Realist

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Security
  • Postcolonial
  • Race and ethnicity

Cite this

Khalid, M. (2019). Gender, race, and the insecurity of 'security'. In C. E. Gentry, L. J. Shepherd, & L. Sjoberg (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of gender and security (pp. 37-47). London ; New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315525099
Khalid, Maryam. / Gender, race, and the insecurity of 'security'. The Routledge handbook of gender and security. editor / Caron E. Gentry ; Laura J. Shepherd ; Laura Sjoberg. London ; New York : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2019. pp. 37-47
@inbook{ab99120b6b38457ba89aab82cc798a5a,
title = "Gender, race, and the insecurity of 'security'",
abstract = "‘Security’ is a contested concept in International Relations (IR) and related disciplines. Both in terms of scholarly study and practice, ‘security’ reflects a range of assumptions, knowledges, and concerns about the world and the people in it. Security Studies (SS) emerged as a subfield of IR during the Cold War period, dominated largely by realist understandings of the world. Concerned with what was assumed to be the ‘aggressive’ nature of humans and a state system that was rooted in the anarchical, realists (and later neorealists) were concerned with securing the nation-state from outside the boundaries of the national community. While the field has taken broader approaches to ‘security’ (and other related concerns), the function of the state as protector is largely unproblematized. Engaging with mainstream SS entails acknowledging the field’s relationship with the assumptions and logics of mainstream IR more broadly, and how the logics of SS and security-as-practice interact with broader (historical and contemporary) gendered and racialized discourses of global politics, and ultimately function to enable and perpetuate violence.",
keywords = "Gender, Security, Postcolonial, Race and ethnicity",
author = "Maryam Khalid",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.4324/9781315525099",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138696211",
pages = "37--47",
editor = "Gentry, {Caron E.} and Shepherd, {Laura J.} and Laura Sjoberg",
booktitle = "The Routledge handbook of gender and security",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Khalid, M 2019, Gender, race, and the insecurity of 'security'. in CE Gentry, LJ Shepherd & L Sjoberg (eds), The Routledge handbook of gender and security. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London ; New York, pp. 37-47. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315525099

Gender, race, and the insecurity of 'security'. / Khalid, Maryam.

The Routledge handbook of gender and security. ed. / Caron E. Gentry; Laura J. Shepherd; Laura Sjoberg. London ; New York : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2019. p. 37-47.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Gender, race, and the insecurity of 'security'

AU - Khalid, Maryam

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - ‘Security’ is a contested concept in International Relations (IR) and related disciplines. Both in terms of scholarly study and practice, ‘security’ reflects a range of assumptions, knowledges, and concerns about the world and the people in it. Security Studies (SS) emerged as a subfield of IR during the Cold War period, dominated largely by realist understandings of the world. Concerned with what was assumed to be the ‘aggressive’ nature of humans and a state system that was rooted in the anarchical, realists (and later neorealists) were concerned with securing the nation-state from outside the boundaries of the national community. While the field has taken broader approaches to ‘security’ (and other related concerns), the function of the state as protector is largely unproblematized. Engaging with mainstream SS entails acknowledging the field’s relationship with the assumptions and logics of mainstream IR more broadly, and how the logics of SS and security-as-practice interact with broader (historical and contemporary) gendered and racialized discourses of global politics, and ultimately function to enable and perpetuate violence.

AB - ‘Security’ is a contested concept in International Relations (IR) and related disciplines. Both in terms of scholarly study and practice, ‘security’ reflects a range of assumptions, knowledges, and concerns about the world and the people in it. Security Studies (SS) emerged as a subfield of IR during the Cold War period, dominated largely by realist understandings of the world. Concerned with what was assumed to be the ‘aggressive’ nature of humans and a state system that was rooted in the anarchical, realists (and later neorealists) were concerned with securing the nation-state from outside the boundaries of the national community. While the field has taken broader approaches to ‘security’ (and other related concerns), the function of the state as protector is largely unproblematized. Engaging with mainstream SS entails acknowledging the field’s relationship with the assumptions and logics of mainstream IR more broadly, and how the logics of SS and security-as-practice interact with broader (historical and contemporary) gendered and racialized discourses of global politics, and ultimately function to enable and perpetuate violence.

KW - Gender

KW - Security

KW - Postcolonial

KW - Race and ethnicity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058733935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315525099

DO - 10.4324/9781315525099

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138696211

SP - 37

EP - 47

BT - The Routledge handbook of gender and security

A2 - Gentry, Caron E.

A2 - Shepherd, Laura J.

A2 - Sjoberg, Laura

PB - Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group

CY - London ; New York

ER -

Khalid M. Gender, race, and the insecurity of 'security'. In Gentry CE, Shepherd LJ, Sjoberg L, editors, The Routledge handbook of gender and security. London ; New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. 2019. p. 37-47 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315525099