General practitioner-led commissioning in the NHS: Progress, prospects and pitfalls

Russell Mannion*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The latest NHS reforms in England will require all general practices to become members of general practitioner (GP) consortia. These organisations will have responsibility for commissioning the majority of health care for their local populations. This article reviews the history and evidence on impact of the previous models of GP commissioning that have been introduced in the NHS with the aim of distilling key lessons for the design, implementation and evaluation of the latest reforms. GP commissioning has the potential to generate a variety of benefits for the NHS and patients, including lowering elective and non-elective referrals, reducing waiting times, improved coordination of primary and community support services and better financial risk management. GP commissioning has also the potential to reduce patient satisfaction, increase inequalities between geographical areas and may generate substantial management and transaction costs. The GP community will need to display strong directive leadership as well as nurture a culture of collaboration and group camaraderie among practices if the GP consortia model of commissioning is to deliver the desired improvements in quality and performance. The implementation of the new GP consortia model of commissioning needs to be monitored and evaluated to ensure that the benefits are maximized and any unintended and dysfunctional effects mitigated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-15
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Medical Bulletin
Volume97
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • commissioning
  • general practitioners
  • NHS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'General practitioner-led commissioning in the NHS: Progress, prospects and pitfalls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this