Generative methodology

An inquiry into how a university can acknowledge a commitment to its Aboriginal community

Neil Harrison*, Susan Page, Michelle Finneran

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper maps ethical and epistemological issues around attempts by a university to negotiate with the traditional custodians of the Sydney basin, the Darug, to facilitate the intergenerational transmission of knowledge within their community, and through the university curriculum. The theory and practice of research raised some important methodological questions about what constitutes knowledge in Aboriginal and western contexts. The project brought us to reflect upon the epistemological basis of our research to consider whether it was history, ethnography, cultural resource management or memory work. As we worked through these issues during the process of consultation and negotiation with Senior Darug, the inquiry began to focus on how a university can acknowledge a commitment to its community. Such a commitment for a university must be built around attentiveness and respect, rather than an epistemology of control. We find that respecting the power structures and organisation of an Aboriginal community is a crucial step for a university in performing such a commitment. Respect for the established power relations in these communities constitutes the very basis of a generative methodology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-351
Number of pages13
JournalAustralian Educational Researcher
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Generative methodology: An inquiry into how a university can acknowledge a commitment to its Aboriginal community'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this