Geographical indications, the EU and Australia: a case study on 'government at a distance' through intellectual property rights

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The way Geographical Indications (GIs) operate has not been well theorised. The main purpose of this article is to develop from the Australian position, a theoretical approach to explain their operation. This objective is based on the assumption that one of the outcomes of political-economic theory is to outline the structural elements of human systems to explain how the various ‘actors’ involved relate to each other.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-165
Number of pages11
JournalMacquarie law journal
Volume7
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Bibliographical note

Publisher version archived with the permission of the Dean, Division of Law, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia. This copy is available for individual, non-commercial use. Permission to reprint/republish this version for other uses must be obtained from the publisher.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Geographical indications, the EU and Australia: a case study on 'government at a distance' through intellectual property rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this