Geologic evidence for a mantle superplume event at 1.9 Ga

Kent C. Condie, David J. Des Marais, Dallas Abbott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)


Both preserved and restored areal distributions of Proterozoic marine intracratonic, passive margin, and platform sediments show a prominent peak at ∼1.9 Ga, indicating that shallow marine sediments were widespread on the continents and that sea level was high at this time. The chemical index of alteration in shales deposited at this time was high, suggesting warm climates, possibly due to enhanced CO2 levels in the atmosphere. High sea level and warms climate may also explain an abundance of black shale, banded iron formations, and shallow marine phosphate deposits and an increase in the number of occurrences and diversity of stromatolites in general and microdigitate stromatolites at 1.9 Ga. All of these observations are consistent with a 1.9-Ga superplume event. The occurrence of only a minor positive carbon isotope shift in marine carbonates at 1.9 Ga indicates that the relative rates of burial of organic and oxidized carbon remained about the same as at present. Slightly low 87Sr/86Sr isotopic ratios in seawater at 1.9 Ga reflect increased mantle input of Sr from the proposed superplume event, whereas higher ratios at 1.85-1.75 Ga may reflect increased input of continental Sr from a growing supercontinent. The first massive sulfate evaporites in the geologic record at 1.8-1.6 Ga follow the possible 1.9-Ga superplume event. This may reflect an increase in both oxidation state and carbonate deposition in the oceans as plume-related volcanism wanes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2000
Externally publishedYes


  • black shales
  • carbon isotopes
  • Mantle plumes
  • sea level
  • superplume


Dive into the research topics of 'Geologic evidence for a mantle superplume event at 1.9 Ga'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this