Ghostlier demarcations

Michael D. Jackson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This memoiristic essay is a contribution to the Common Knowledge symposium titled "Fuzzy Studies: On the consequence of blur." While probing his personal memories and making a case for devaluing our intellectual constructs, the author, an anthropologist, examines paintings by Paul Cézanne and Pieter Bruegel, poems by Wallace Stevens and W. H. Auden. The essay argues that each self-deluding "reality" we construct is only temporary, destined to fall back into the elusive, undifferentiated zone of overlap and ambiguity from which it has emerged. Therefore, the author urges, we should temper the intellectual "rage for order" with an openness to chaos and contingency, along with sustained and careful attention to creative works and religious practices in which the mind appears to grasp its limits. In this way, we may substitute what Stevens called "ghostlier demarcations" for our clear, exact, and self-deceptive certainties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-110
Number of pages15
JournalCommon Knowledge
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ghostlier demarcations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this