TY - JOUR
T1 - GINA 2020
T2 - potential impacts, opportunities, and challenges for primary care
AU - Kaplan, Alan
AU - van Boven, Job F. M.
AU - Ryan, Dermot
AU - Tsiligianni, Ioanna
AU - Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia
AU - REG Adherence Working Group
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - In 2019, it was reported that changes to asthma management reported in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) “…might be considered the most fundamental changes in asthma management in 30 years.” These changes refer to the recommendation that the treatment of asthma in adolescents and adults would no longer include short-acting ß
2-agonist (SABA) only, but that people with asthma should receive either symptom-driven inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-containing treatment (mild asthma) or daily ICS-containing treatment. The fundamental reason for this shift was driven by concerns about the risks and consequences associated with SABA-only treatment, the need to improve the day-to-day management of asthma symptoms to prevent exacerbations and emergent evidence. These recommendations have subsequently been reinforced and characterized in GINA 2020, and it is reasonable to say that they are significant, not only in terms of an asthma management framework but also as a management approach in practice. This opinion article specifically focuses on opportunities and challenges associated with the implementation of GINA 2020 in primary care practice that need to be recognized and addressed if the shift in asthma treatment paradigm is to be successfully implemented into day-to-day practice.
AB - In 2019, it was reported that changes to asthma management reported in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) “…might be considered the most fundamental changes in asthma management in 30 years.” These changes refer to the recommendation that the treatment of asthma in adolescents and adults would no longer include short-acting ß
2-agonist (SABA) only, but that people with asthma should receive either symptom-driven inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-containing treatment (mild asthma) or daily ICS-containing treatment. The fundamental reason for this shift was driven by concerns about the risks and consequences associated with SABA-only treatment, the need to improve the day-to-day management of asthma symptoms to prevent exacerbations and emergent evidence. These recommendations have subsequently been reinforced and characterized in GINA 2020, and it is reasonable to say that they are significant, not only in terms of an asthma management framework but also as a management approach in practice. This opinion article specifically focuses on opportunities and challenges associated with the implementation of GINA 2020 in primary care practice that need to be recognized and addressed if the shift in asthma treatment paradigm is to be successfully implemented into day-to-day practice.
KW - Asthma management
KW - GINA 2020
KW - Implementation
KW - Primary care
KW - Translation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100104460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.035
DO - 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.035
M3 - Article
C2 - 33373689
SN - 2213-2198
VL - 9
SP - 1516
EP - 1519
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
IS - 4
ER -