Abstract
Why was China responsive to regional organisations' call for intervention in the case of the Libya crisis, where it supported sanctions and an International Criminal Court referral, and acquiesced to a no-fly zone, but unresponsive to pressure from regional organisations for intervention in the Syria crisis, issuing repeated vetoes instead? Using interviews and other primary data, this article explains the variation by highlighting that China is most responsive to regional organisations when these groups remain cohesive, congregate around the same policy position and when they publicly criticise or isolate China.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 33-50 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Third World Quarterly |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Libya
- Syria
- regional organisations
- intervention
- Arab Spring
- China
- United Nations