Globalising democracy: reflections on Habermas's radicalismReflections on Habermas's radicalism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

According to many of his critics, Habermas is so preoccupied with 'old normative maps' that he cannot really help us chart our options in a fast globalizing world. The following article contests aspects of this familiar critique. The argument is developed in three stages. First, some misapprehensions are targeted. No unreconstructed liberal, Habermas is shown to offer a discriminating interpretation of learning processes that need to guide political democracy in a global context. The far-reaching agenda of Habermas's programme for a globalized and democratized welfare project is underlined. Next, Habermas's attempt to bring forward the normative resources of liberal democratic histories is contrasted with Ulrich Beck's normative avant-gardism. This latter is shown to be a mere semblance of radicalism that serves to legitimate the triumph of one particular axis within modernization processes. Finally, the article explores a dilemma that faces Habermas's attempt to use the potentials of a particular cultural tradition as the normative grounds for a globally extended democracy. Habermas wants to avoid reducing critical theory to the mere affirmation of certain parochial cultural choices and so tries to find grounds for establishing the universal resonance of these normative contents. The last section looks into the ideological character of this attempt and considers an alternative way in which the inter-cultural significance of democratic Enlightenment commitments might be tested.

LanguageEnglish
Pages71-86
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Theory
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

radicalism
democracy
critical theory
modernization
critic
learning process
welfare
commitment
interpretation
history
resources

Keywords

  • Beck
  • fundamentalism
  • global democracy
  • Habermas
  • normativity

Cite this

@article{3abe4dc213aa4ae691dc231f1becdf89,
title = "Globalising democracy: reflections on Habermas's radicalismReflections on Habermas's radicalism",
abstract = "According to many of his critics, Habermas is so preoccupied with 'old normative maps' that he cannot really help us chart our options in a fast globalizing world. The following article contests aspects of this familiar critique. The argument is developed in three stages. First, some misapprehensions are targeted. No unreconstructed liberal, Habermas is shown to offer a discriminating interpretation of learning processes that need to guide political democracy in a global context. The far-reaching agenda of Habermas's programme for a globalized and democratized welfare project is underlined. Next, Habermas's attempt to bring forward the normative resources of liberal democratic histories is contrasted with Ulrich Beck's normative avant-gardism. This latter is shown to be a mere semblance of radicalism that serves to legitimate the triumph of one particular axis within modernization processes. Finally, the article explores a dilemma that faces Habermas's attempt to use the potentials of a particular cultural tradition as the normative grounds for a globally extended democracy. Habermas wants to avoid reducing critical theory to the mere affirmation of certain parochial cultural choices and so tries to find grounds for establishing the universal resonance of these normative contents. The last section looks into the ideological character of this attempt and considers an alternative way in which the inter-cultural significance of democratic Enlightenment commitments might be tested.",
keywords = "Beck, fundamentalism, global democracy, Habermas, normativity",
author = "Pauline Johnson",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1177/1368431007085288",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "71--86",
journal = "European Journal of Social Theory",
issn = "1368-4310",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Globalising democracy : reflections on Habermas's radicalismReflections on Habermas's radicalism. / Johnson, Pauline.

In: European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2008, p. 71-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Globalising democracy

T2 - European Journal of Social Theory

AU - Johnson, Pauline

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - According to many of his critics, Habermas is so preoccupied with 'old normative maps' that he cannot really help us chart our options in a fast globalizing world. The following article contests aspects of this familiar critique. The argument is developed in three stages. First, some misapprehensions are targeted. No unreconstructed liberal, Habermas is shown to offer a discriminating interpretation of learning processes that need to guide political democracy in a global context. The far-reaching agenda of Habermas's programme for a globalized and democratized welfare project is underlined. Next, Habermas's attempt to bring forward the normative resources of liberal democratic histories is contrasted with Ulrich Beck's normative avant-gardism. This latter is shown to be a mere semblance of radicalism that serves to legitimate the triumph of one particular axis within modernization processes. Finally, the article explores a dilemma that faces Habermas's attempt to use the potentials of a particular cultural tradition as the normative grounds for a globally extended democracy. Habermas wants to avoid reducing critical theory to the mere affirmation of certain parochial cultural choices and so tries to find grounds for establishing the universal resonance of these normative contents. The last section looks into the ideological character of this attempt and considers an alternative way in which the inter-cultural significance of democratic Enlightenment commitments might be tested.

AB - According to many of his critics, Habermas is so preoccupied with 'old normative maps' that he cannot really help us chart our options in a fast globalizing world. The following article contests aspects of this familiar critique. The argument is developed in three stages. First, some misapprehensions are targeted. No unreconstructed liberal, Habermas is shown to offer a discriminating interpretation of learning processes that need to guide political democracy in a global context. The far-reaching agenda of Habermas's programme for a globalized and democratized welfare project is underlined. Next, Habermas's attempt to bring forward the normative resources of liberal democratic histories is contrasted with Ulrich Beck's normative avant-gardism. This latter is shown to be a mere semblance of radicalism that serves to legitimate the triumph of one particular axis within modernization processes. Finally, the article explores a dilemma that faces Habermas's attempt to use the potentials of a particular cultural tradition as the normative grounds for a globally extended democracy. Habermas wants to avoid reducing critical theory to the mere affirmation of certain parochial cultural choices and so tries to find grounds for establishing the universal resonance of these normative contents. The last section looks into the ideological character of this attempt and considers an alternative way in which the inter-cultural significance of democratic Enlightenment commitments might be tested.

KW - Beck

KW - fundamentalism

KW - global democracy

KW - Habermas

KW - normativity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349048622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1368431007085288

DO - 10.1177/1368431007085288

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 71

EP - 86

JO - European Journal of Social Theory

JF - European Journal of Social Theory

SN - 1368-4310

IS - 1

ER -