Going the distance: ethics of space and location on accessing reproductive services in Australia

Angie Sassano*, Christopher Mayes, Ian Kerridge, Wendy Lipworth

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Qualitative studies on assisted reproductive technology commonly focus on the perspectives of participants living in major metropolises. In doing so, the experiences of those living outside major cities, and the unique way conditions of spatiality shape access to treatment, are elided. In this paper, we examine how location and regionality in Australia impact upon access and experience of reproductive services. We conducted twelve qualitative interviews with participants residing in regional areas across Australia. We asked participants to discuss their experience with assisted reproduction services and the impacts of location on access, service choice, and experience of care, and analysed the data using reflexive thematic analysis, as outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006, 2019). Participants in this study reported that their location impacted the services available to them, required considerable time in travel, and reduced continuity of care. We draw on these responses to examine the ethical implications of uneven distribution of reproductive services in commercial healthcare settings which rely on market-based mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-235
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Bioethical Inquiry
Volume20
Issue number2
Early online date20 Mar 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2023. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Assisted reproductive technology
  • Rural bioethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Going the distance: ethics of space and location on accessing reproductive services in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this