Good faith in contractual performance - smoke without flame?

Tyrone M. Carlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The question of the status of implied good faith performance obligations as an element of the Australian law of contract continues to lurk as a vital yet unresolved jurisprudential puzzle. Given the vital importance of contract as a foundation for commercial exchange and the potential for a good faith performance doctrine to materially impact the operation of contracts, this is an undesirable state of affairs. The evidence presented in this paper suggests that the approach taken to good faith performance has fragmented along jurisdictional lines. Further, far from representing a well developed and established doctrine, it has been the project of a very limited number of judges primarily drawn from just one state. These observations raise significant questions as to the legitimacy of the alleged doctrine.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-37
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of law and financial management
Volume4
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Bibliographical note

Publisher version archived with the permission of the publisher Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia. This archived copy is available for individual, non-commercial use. Permission to use this version for other uses must be obtained from the publisher.

Keywords

  • contract
  • implied terms
  • good faith

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Good faith in contractual performance - smoke without flame?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this