'Got him': revenge, emotions, and the killing of Osama bin Laden

Lloyd Cox*, Steve Wood

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The extrajudicial killing of Osama bin Laden (OBL) on 2 May 2011 was greeted with jubilation in the United States. The dominant interpretation of the event-expressed in US media, by US political elites, and on the streets of US cities-was that justice had been served on the perpetrator of the 9/11 atrocity and thereby a great historical wrong had been righted. This article argues that the 'justice' deployed was a proxy for revenge, understood as the infliction of harm on those who had inflicted harm on the avenger. The argument is situated in a broader discussion of the emotional topography on which acts of state revenge are politically premised. The bin Laden case is used to explore some issues raised by the growing literature on emotions in politics and International Relations including, most importantly, how emotions are collectivised and made public.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)112-129
    Number of pages18
    JournalReview of International Studies
    Volume43
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

    Keywords

    • Emotions
    • Osama bin Laden
    • Revenge
    • United States

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of ''Got him': revenge, emotions, and the killing of Osama bin Laden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this