Green space and loneliness: a systematic review with theoretical and methodological guidance for future research

Thomas Astell-Burt, Terry Hartig, Gusti Ngurah Edi Putra, Ramya Walsan, Tashi Dendup, Xiaoqi Feng

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

64 Citations (Scopus)
60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Persistent loneliness troubles people across the life span, with prevalence as high as 61 % in some groups. Urban greening may help to reduce the population health impacts of loneliness and its concomitants, such as hopelessness and despair. However, the literature lacks both a critical appraisal of extant evidence and a conceptual model to explain how green space would work as a structural intervention. Both are needed to guide decision making and further research. We conducted a systematic review of quantitative studies testing associations between green space and loneliness, searching seven databases. Twenty two studies were identified by 25/01/2022. Most of the studies were conducted in high-income countries and fifteen (68 %) had cross-sectional designs. Green space was measured inconsistently using either objective or subjective indicators. Few studies examined specific green space types or qualities. The majority of studies measured general loneliness (e.g. using the UCLA loneliness scale). Different types of loneliness (social, emotional, existential) were not analysed. Of 132 associations, 88 (66.6 %) indicated potential protection from green space against loneliness, with 44 (33.3 %) reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05). We integrated these findings with evidence from qualitative studies to elaborate and extend the existing pathway domain model linking green space and health. These elaborations and extensions acknowledge the following: (a) different types of green space have implications for different types of loneliness; (b) multilevel circumstances influence the likelihood a person will benefit or suffer harm from green space; (c) personal, relational, and collective processes operate within different domains of pathways linking green space with loneliness and its concomitants; (d) loneliness and its concomitants are explicitly positioned as mediators within the broader causal system that links green space with health and wellbeing. This review and model provide guidance for decision making and further epidemiological research on green space and loneliness.
Original languageEnglish
Article number157521
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume847
Early online date22 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2022

Bibliographical note

Copyright 2022. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Green space and loneliness: a systematic review with theoretical and methodological guidance for future research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this