Growth and new directions? Research in tertiary mathematical science education

Bill Barton*, Merrilyn Goos, Leigh Wood, Adel Miskovich

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The chapter on university learners of mathematics in the previous four-yearly review concluded that mathematics learning and teaching was in a "state of flux" (Wood, 2008, p. 91). The research reviewed in that chapter reported contradictory findings: perhaps because there was little attempt to delve beneath the surface features of lectures to inquire into conditions that support student learning. Deficit models of student learning were often implicit in these studies. There was significant interest in teaching with technology, but investigations into the effectiveness of computer hardware and software tended to look at student achievement gains without exploring the nature of the learning that was promoted. Although it was encouraging to see growing interest in university teaching and learning of mathematics, research was being conducted in a piecemeal fashion without the findings being interpreted in the light of theory. Not surprisingly then, the main challenge identified by the last review was building an integrated and theoretically informed body of research.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2008-2011
EditorsBob Perry, Tom Lowrie, Tracy Logan, Amy MacDonald, Jane Greenless
Place of PublicationRotterdam, The Netherlands
PublisherSense Publishers
Pages245-265
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9789460919701
ISBN (Print)9789460919688, 9789460919695
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Growth and new directions? Research in tertiary mathematical science education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this