Guess who? On the importance of using appropriate name: case study of Marphysa sanguinea (Montagu, 1803)

Nicolas Lavesque*, Guillemine Daffe, Jacques Grall, Joana Zanol, Benoit Gouillieux, Patricia Hutchings

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    30 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The common bait worm Marphysa sanguinea (Montagu, 1813), originally described from the south coast of England, is the type species of the genus. This species has been widely reported from all around the world and has been considered as cosmopolitan until recently. This is partly because the original description was very brief and poorly illustrated, and also because all species superficially look similar. In order to clarify the situation, M. sanguinea was redescribed and a neotype was designated by Hutchings and Karageorgpoulos in 2003. Recently, specimens from Cornwall, close to the type locality, were sampled, examined morphologically, and used to obtain COI gene sequences for this species. Molecular results permitted us to confirm the identity and presence of M. sanguinea along the French coasts and to highlight the presence of inaccurate sequences of this species on GenBank. Use of this “false” cosmopolitan species at a worldwide scale by many biologists is also discussed in this paper.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-15
    Number of pages15
    JournalZooKeys
    Volume859
    Early online date2 Jul 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright the Author(s) 2025. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

    Keywords

    • Bait worms
    • cosmopolitan species
    • misidentification
    • molecular
    • taxonomy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Guess who? On the importance of using appropriate name: case study of Marphysa sanguinea (Montagu, 1803)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this