Projects per year
May Gibbs’s gumnut stories are central to the development of an Australian national imaginary. By connecting the natural ‘bush’ environment to settler-colonial social issues and scenes, Gibbs’s imagery and narrative reimagined the bush as a ‘home’ for colonizers, essentially ‘indigenising’ them in the image of white gumnut babies. The most comprehensive and influential interpretations of Gibbs’s work emphasize its currency to contemporaneous life and cultural trends, and its deft negotiation of sexuality, through the figures of the voluptuous gumnut babies and scrawny bad Banksia Men, who are covered with hair and ‘lips.’ A less prevalent but no less convincing interpretation underscores the dimension of race within Gibbs’s work: the whiteness of the stories’ heroes, and the blackness, even Aboriginality, of their nemeses, the wicked Banksia men. Through the concept of the fetish, this article interprets the banksia as an object produced in an intercultural space, and reproducing (in Gibbs’s stories) a set of racial anxieties about the Other in terms of sex and sexuality. How does race come to be parsed as sex? And what does the confluence of these anxieties reveal about settler representations of Aboriginality and the colonial mindset?
|Number of pages||17|
|Early online date||11 Oct 2021|
|Publication status||Published - 2021|
- Australian children’s fiction
- May Gibbs
- settler colonialism
- the fetish
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Gumnuts in the garden of good and evil: racialization and fetishism in May Gibbs's Snugglepot and Cuddlepie'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
ARC Future Fellowship: Significances of 'childhood' in postcolonial Australia
6/02/18 → 5/02/21