Habermas: a reasonable Utopian?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Already by the mid-1980s, Habermas supposed that our utopian energies had been used up. Today, when a neoliberal 'realism' seems to be a virtually dominant ideology, the climate appears, if anything, yet more hostile to radical hopes. Even while he recognises the obstacles and is clear that we might never succeed in breaking through the 'Gordian knot', Habermas is not prepared to surrender to a proclaimed 'end of politics'. This paper traces some of the ways in which his recent works theorise and attempt to balance twin legacies of a critical theory tradition. Habermas wants to mediate the radicalness of vision required by a critical theory with the perceived reasonableness of its standpoint that is also necessary if theory is to engage concrete actors. Many of his critics suppose that Habermas has not achieved the right balance and that his interest in the self-reforming potentials of liberal democracies weights reasonableness too highly. The following paper sets out to defend Habermas from some of these charges. However, ultimately it finds that his theory has identified the needs for autonomy that it seeks to critically connect up with too narrowly. This means that, to some extent, Habermas' critical theory continues to 'miss its mark'.

LanguageEnglish
Pages101-118
Number of pages18
JournalCritical Horizons
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

critical theory
reasonableness
realism
critic
ideology
autonomy
climate
democracy
energy
politics
Utopian
Critical Theory

Keywords

  • Habermas
  • Critical Theory
  • Utopianism
  • Enlightenment
  • Romanticism

Cite this

Johnson, Pauline. / Habermas : a reasonable Utopian?. In: Critical Horizons. 2005 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 101-118.
@article{82379721573344adb12ca998d1552bca,
title = "Habermas: a reasonable Utopian?",
abstract = "Already by the mid-1980s, Habermas supposed that our utopian energies had been used up. Today, when a neoliberal 'realism' seems to be a virtually dominant ideology, the climate appears, if anything, yet more hostile to radical hopes. Even while he recognises the obstacles and is clear that we might never succeed in breaking through the 'Gordian knot', Habermas is not prepared to surrender to a proclaimed 'end of politics'. This paper traces some of the ways in which his recent works theorise and attempt to balance twin legacies of a critical theory tradition. Habermas wants to mediate the radicalness of vision required by a critical theory with the perceived reasonableness of its standpoint that is also necessary if theory is to engage concrete actors. Many of his critics suppose that Habermas has not achieved the right balance and that his interest in the self-reforming potentials of liberal democracies weights reasonableness too highly. The following paper sets out to defend Habermas from some of these charges. However, ultimately it finds that his theory has identified the needs for autonomy that it seeks to critically connect up with too narrowly. This means that, to some extent, Habermas' critical theory continues to 'miss its mark'.",
keywords = "Habermas, Critical Theory, Utopianism, Enlightenment, Romanticism",
author = "Pauline Johnson",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1163/156851605775009582",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "101--118",
journal = "Critical Horizons",
issn = "1440-9917",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "1",

}

Habermas : a reasonable Utopian? / Johnson, Pauline.

In: Critical Horizons, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2005, p. 101-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Habermas

T2 - Critical Horizons

AU - Johnson, Pauline

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Already by the mid-1980s, Habermas supposed that our utopian energies had been used up. Today, when a neoliberal 'realism' seems to be a virtually dominant ideology, the climate appears, if anything, yet more hostile to radical hopes. Even while he recognises the obstacles and is clear that we might never succeed in breaking through the 'Gordian knot', Habermas is not prepared to surrender to a proclaimed 'end of politics'. This paper traces some of the ways in which his recent works theorise and attempt to balance twin legacies of a critical theory tradition. Habermas wants to mediate the radicalness of vision required by a critical theory with the perceived reasonableness of its standpoint that is also necessary if theory is to engage concrete actors. Many of his critics suppose that Habermas has not achieved the right balance and that his interest in the self-reforming potentials of liberal democracies weights reasonableness too highly. The following paper sets out to defend Habermas from some of these charges. However, ultimately it finds that his theory has identified the needs for autonomy that it seeks to critically connect up with too narrowly. This means that, to some extent, Habermas' critical theory continues to 'miss its mark'.

AB - Already by the mid-1980s, Habermas supposed that our utopian energies had been used up. Today, when a neoliberal 'realism' seems to be a virtually dominant ideology, the climate appears, if anything, yet more hostile to radical hopes. Even while he recognises the obstacles and is clear that we might never succeed in breaking through the 'Gordian knot', Habermas is not prepared to surrender to a proclaimed 'end of politics'. This paper traces some of the ways in which his recent works theorise and attempt to balance twin legacies of a critical theory tradition. Habermas wants to mediate the radicalness of vision required by a critical theory with the perceived reasonableness of its standpoint that is also necessary if theory is to engage concrete actors. Many of his critics suppose that Habermas has not achieved the right balance and that his interest in the self-reforming potentials of liberal democracies weights reasonableness too highly. The following paper sets out to defend Habermas from some of these charges. However, ultimately it finds that his theory has identified the needs for autonomy that it seeks to critically connect up with too narrowly. This means that, to some extent, Habermas' critical theory continues to 'miss its mark'.

KW - Habermas

KW - Critical Theory

KW - Utopianism

KW - Enlightenment

KW - Romanticism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748942502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/156851605775009582

DO - 10.1163/156851605775009582

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 101

EP - 118

JO - Critical Horizons

JF - Critical Horizons

SN - 1440-9917

IS - 1

ER -