Health information technology: Fallacies and sober realities

Ben Tzion Karsh*, Matthew B. Weinger, Patricia A. Abbott, Robert L. Wears

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

280 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current research suggests that the rate of adoption of health information technology (HIT) is low, and that HIT may not have the touted beneficial effects on quality of care or costs. The twin issues of the failure of HIT adoption and of HIT efficacy stem primarily from a series of fallacies about HIT. We discuss 12 HIT fallacies and their implications for design and implementation. These fallacies must be understood and addressed for HIT to yield better results. Foundational cognitive and human factors engineering research and development are essential to better inform HIT development, deployment, and use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)617-623
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health information technology: Fallacies and sober realities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this