Health-related quality of life

a comparison of outcomes after lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with large joint replacement surgery and population norms

Sabarul A. Mokhtar*, Peter F. McCombe, Owen D. Williamson, Michael K. Morgan, Gavin J. White, William R. Sears

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    28 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background context: Degenerative spine disease will become an increasing health problem, and a significant number of patients will be considered for surgery. Spinal surgeries have evolved since the last decades, and there is a positive impact on the clinical outcomes. Few works in the literature have reviewed the outcome compared with large joint replacement surgery, which is considered a benchmark for operative restoration of patients' quality of life. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate if spinal fusion can return patients' health-related quality of life to that of age-matched population norms and yield outcomes comparable with those of total hip and knee joint replacement. Study design: This is a prospective cohort study. Patient sample: The sample consists of 100 consecutive patients who were enrolled between December 1997 and January 2007. Outcome measures: The 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) was chosen for outcome measurement. Methods: All patients underwent wide decompressive laminectomy and single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Results: The preoperative and postoperative physical component summary (PCS)-12 scores of the spinal fusion patients were comparable with those of both the total knee and hip replacement patients. The mean improvement in PCS-12 scores after spine surgery was 11 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9-14, p<.0001). It was equal to that after total hip replacement surgery, which was 11 (95% CI: 9-13), and higher than that of total knee replacement patients, which had an improvement of 8 (95% CI: 7-9). The postoperative mean and 95% CI of the PCS-12 scores for the three surgical procedures approached the population norm value of 44 (95% CI: 43-46).There was no statistical difference between the postoperative mental component summary-12 score among all the three surgical groups, which approached similar to the population norm value of 54 (95% CI: 53-54). Conclusions: The current study demonstrated that spinal surgery can return patients' HRQL to that of age-matched population norms and yield outcomes comparable with those of total hip and knee joint replacement patients.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)306-312
    Number of pages7
    JournalSpine Journal
    Volume10
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Health-related quality of life: a comparison of outcomes after lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with large joint replacement surgery and population norms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this