Abstract
This paper is concerned with organic conceptions of sociopolitical life and is concerned with the rehabilitation of organicism as a positive social ontology. It demonstrates that: organicism does not necessarily imply the negation of individuality by a monolithic society, and; that G. W. F. Hegel's references to the state as organic do not imply social holism. With Hegel's organicism, as with Idealist organicism generally, what is found is a relational rather than a holistic social ontology. This relational ontology is one that addresses the tension between individualism and holism by theorizing the reciprocal or recursive nature of social relations; thus neither society nor the individuals within it can be seen as either purely determined or purely determining, each contributes to the constitution of the other. In making this case the paper provides both: a conceptual articulation of relational organicism which shows that it is an instructive and coherent positive social ontology, and; a historical account of its emergence into Idealist thought in the work of Immanuel Kant and G. W. F. Hegel. Through developing this account of the organic relation this paper seeks to offer a conception of socio-political life that provides resources for thinking through both the tension between holism and atomism in social theory and the tension between liberal individualism and communitarian collectivism in political theory.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 317-336 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Critical Horizons |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Hegel
- Holism
- Individualism
- Organicism
- Politics
- Social Ontology