Heidegger's Nietzsche, and the finite repetition of difference

Emily Hughes*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

In this review essay, I take up a critical analysis of three recently published monographs in Heidegger-Nietzsche scholarship. Whilst their projects are diverse, I suggest that Winkler, Parra and Armitage are each fundamentally concerned with the critique of the Cartesian subject in Heidegger's interpretation of Nietzsche and attempt to varying extents to ground this problematization of subjectivity in the phenomenon of time. Nevertheless, whilst each emphasises the importance of time in understanding both Heidegger's and Nietzsche's critique of the subject, it is surprising that they either underplay or misappropriate the significance of eternal recurrence, the temporal phenomenon which Heidegger defines as Nietzsche's "thought of thoughts." After engaging each account, my aim is to then consider how they might be critically re-framed in light of Heidegger's interpretation of eternal recurrence which, I suggest, is fundamental to understanding Heidegger's engagement with Nietzsche, as well as his own philosophical project more broadly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)376-380
Number of pages5
JournalNietzsche-Studien
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2023. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Descartes
  • Eternal recurrence
  • Heidegger
  • Subject
  • Time

Cite this