Historicizing edai siabo: A contemporary argument about the pre-colonial past among the Motu-Koita of papua New Guinea

Michael Goddard*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)
    353 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In the 1970s the Motu-Koita, traditional inhabitants of what is now the National Capital District of Papua New Guinea, inaugurated a yearly cultural festival thematically based on traditional coastal trading voyages known as hiri. Contestation over the location and commercialization of the festival in the capital city developed in the new century as one distant village claimed to 'own' the hiri. The Motu-Koita view of their past and their identity has been affected by their encounter with Christianity, colonialism and its aftermath, and the rhetoric of the villagers' claims drew on criteria of authenticity, cultural purity, and exclusiveness which are arguably contemporary rather than 'traditional'. This article reviews Motu-Koita history, the story of the origin of the hiri, and the local politics of the cultural festival. It attempts to understand the way the past, which was formerly mythopoeically invoked, is being historicized and thereby fixed in new local discourses of cultural and heritage rights and ownership, as Melanesians come to terms with the effects of global processes on their traditions and other resources.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)280-296
    Number of pages17
    JournalOceania
    Volume81
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright the Publisher 2011. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Historicizing edai siabo: A contemporary argument about the pre-colonial past among the Motu-Koita of papua New Guinea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this