Home visiting intervention for vulnerable families with newborns

follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial

Jennifer A. Fraser*, Kenneth L. Armstrong, Jeanette P. Morris, Mark R. Dadds

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: This study aimed to: (1) Assess the community utility of a screening tool to identify families with child abuse or neglect risk factors in the immediate postnatal period (2) Determine the social validity and effectiveness of a home visiting program using community child health nurses and offering social work services for identified families, and (3) Identify factors in the immediate postnatal period associated with the child's environment that predict poor adjustment to the parenting role. Method: A randomized controlled trial using a cohort of 181 families was undertaken to evaluate the impact of a home visiting program. Mothers were recruited in the immediate postnatal period and allocated either into the home visiting program or into a comparison group. The research design required self-identification into the study by providing positive responses to a range of risk factors. A repeated measures design was used to test parenting stress and maternal depression from the immediate postnatal period to 12-month follow-up and physical child abuse potential to 18-month follow-up. To test whether measures taken in the immediate postnatal period were predictive for poor adjustment to the parenting role, a linear regression model was used. Results: The screening procedure was shown to have utility in the context of recruitment to a research trial and mothers were willing to accept the home visiting program examined by this study from the immediate postnatal period. From as early as 6 weeks the program demonstrated ability to impact positively on maternal, infant, family, and home environment variables (testing 90 randomly allocated intervention vs. 91 comparison families). At follow-up, parental adjustment variables were not significantly different between groups (testing the remaining 68 (75.5%) intervention vs. 70 (76.9%) comparison families) and home environment assessment scores had converged. Predictive analysis of factors measured in the immediate postnatal period revealed an absence of any predictive value to demographic characteristics, which secondary prevention efforts typically target. Conclusions: Follow-up evaluation did not demonstrate a positive impact on parenting stress, parenting competence, or quality of the home environment confirming the need to test early program success on longer term outcomes. Further, the study not only demonstrated that there was a relationship between maternal, family and environmental factors identified in the immediate postnatal period, and adjustment to the parenting role, but also challenged demographic targeting for child abuse and neglect risk. At the same time, the immediate postnatal period presented an exciting window of opportunity to access high-risk families who may otherwise have become marginalized from traditional services. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1399-1429
Number of pages31
JournalChild Abuse and Neglect
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes


  • Child abuse
  • Child health
  • Home visiting
  • Postpartum mood disorder
  • Preventive medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Home visiting intervention for vulnerable families with newborns: follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this